Tag Archives: Goldman Sachs

About Face(book) – IPO Now Means “Internal Private Offering”

So 50B (or 25 times current sales) is the valuation for Facebook (see Forbes for a sobering comparison to current public companies) What actually makes this even scarier is NOT the current valuation but the expected valuation.  My guess is that when you invest in a “hot pre-IPO” stock your expectations for a total return probably range from 2 to 4 times the investment (there is a sexiness to the notion of “doubling your money” that is reserved for the big bet).

So given that the investors are expecting this stock to hit 50-100 times current sales.  While it is true that sales will continue to grow its still sobering to see what the expected valuations are (100-200B total market cap).  For reference Google as about a 200B market cap right now and at its peak was about 230B.

Secondly this is a very clever vehicle that gets the employees around the typical 6-month post IPO lock-up period.  The truth is the vast majority of the money going into this offering is actually just being used to cash out insiders (VCs and employees).  As a result they get their IPO (which now means “Internal Private Offering”) and the only ones with the lock-up are the current “market” investors and that lock-up is now 2 years.

The one hopeful note here for those that feel like the wealthy class have been taking advantage of the working class is that the only ones that get taken are the wealthy as not many working class individuals have 2 million to invest right now.

Very clever…

What Would Jesu…Uh, I Mean, Warren Do?

So I have a very simple question, why don’t we get our bailout ideas from someone who knows how to pick a market as opposed to a former Wall Street CEO, failed President and 535 desperate and economically naive, attention/vote hungry lawyers?  Its not elegant but why not just take a page from Warren Buffet?

So he recently gave a cash infusion to Goldman Sachs (see the Wall Street Journal article) in a way meant to maximize his shareholder(s’) value.  The plan basically provided money with a fat interest rate that gave him priority over the exisiting shareholders.  Simply put he got protection and payout while the normal Goldman shareholders assumed most of the risk.   Isn’t that what would make for a very palatable bailout (in the eyes of the taxpayer/investor) for the rest of the banking industry?

True, Goldman is a going concern and the “cream of the crop” in terms of banks.  That is different then the cream-of-the-crap that we (the US taxpayer/investor) would be investing in but we would be the preferred shareholders.  If anything that is much better than purchasing, by design, self-described “toxic assests”. 

This plan has all the benefits of the equity portions of the bailout plan with much less of a downside, namely:

  1. No valuation issues so its quick to accomplish.  Here’s $5 billion, give us a check for $500 million every year and we’ll call it square. 
  2. First in line for payback so we get the upside
  3. Last in line for risk so we don’t get, for the most part, the downside

In short when all else fails, plagiarise